Gimme money.

Nikki Diaz, "Nikkies laugh and Nikkies cry" just like regular human beings. Yeah, and they have no loyalty toward their former country nor for their stolen country.  No sense of legal behavior. No loyalty to an employer who paid her well, no sense of honor.  Only a gimme attitude.

As long as she was getting what whe wanted and living here illegally with no one questioning it, she was happy with her wages. 

Along comes reality.  Now her illegality is exposed. 

Along come dishonest unions - hah, she has found someone as slimily dishonest as herself!  Throw the generous employer under the bus and gimme, gimme some free and easy money!

I wonder if her big, phony Nikki tears are flowing now - reportedly she got less than $6000 for her melodramatic act.  No doubt she was expecting enough to live the rest of her life without lifting a finger.  Big tears time.  But, hey, maybe she can put a gimme squeeze on Jerry Brown. 

Go for it Nikki.  You are way past a regular human being by now, anyway.  You've proven you are a sorry human being, a gimme.

TSA, Groping Toward Sexual Assault

TSA policies are making news lately.  On one side of the issue are those who want to feel safe whatever the cost to personal privacy; on the other are those who believe the government's hand deep in our pocket is enough and are saying no to putting their hands in our underwear.

I know I won't fly if I have to endure sexual abuse to be allowed on the plane.  And, yes, it does meet the criteria for sexual abuse.  Persons in authority without permission touching not just your person but your private areas and the victims feeling forced to submit to this behavior.  If it wasn't the government performing this disgraceful groping, it would be a prosecutable offense.

One thing I find interesting is that the Big Napo Capo "is considering" the objections of the Muslims (but not the objections of regular US citizens).  Amazing that the very people who should be watched more carefully get consideration.  When did the US citizen become the enemy in the US?  What the heck is wrong with the people running this show?

Another interesting detail is that they want to grope the pilots, as well.  What the heck?  If the pilots want to commit mayhem, they are steering a mega-ton weapon charged with aviation fuel.  Why would they carry any other?

And I also found interesting the photo of a TSA guy groping a male passenger (the one that has been aired often in the past two or three days) - does it seem to you that the groper is just enjoying it too much - looks like a smile on his face to me.  If I were that victim, I'd be likely to kick him in the teeth.

And the "enhanced" TSA techniques are't failsafe.  They do not detect whatever may be carried in body cavities -- so penetration is next.  Won't that be jolly?  A finger digging around and then you must sit on that sore area for your flight.  I can hear it now, "Well, if I feel safer and they use clean gloves, a little soreness is worth it."  Will they use KY jelly to "enhance" the experience?

I remember when the government in the role of Big Brother watching us was considered an imposition.  Now the government is playing the role of Great Fornicator - and although they've been doing that to us for a while, they are now "enhancing" it with actual touching - and actual penetration looms in the near future.

Meanwhile, the Big Napo Capo makes no effort to curtail the "penetration" of our southern border.  She still seems to feel a terrorist attack coming across that border is much preferable to an attack flying in over any border.  If she dies from a bomb that was carried through Mexico, will she be less dead than if she dies from a bomb flown in to the US?

Truly, it's not about security, it's all about submission to the government.  Where do you draw the line?

Another Un-award in Fairy Tale Land

The New York Times (yes, even the left leaning Times!)  called the Chev Volt  “GM's electric lemon.”  It's that bad!

If you are not familiar with it, the Volt is Obama's little electric car experiment.  Only I fear it will not remain an experiment, but will be shoved down our throats like the Obama Unhealth Care bill. 

No transport, no health care, here we come third world - and get out of the way! We are barrelling down that road faster than a Volt's top speed.  In case of an accident, don't call your health care provider - you won't be covered unless you are in this country illegally.

Anyway, this little "car" has been named Motor Trend's Car of the Year. Now there's an award as meaningful as the Nobel Prize awarded for no accomplishment.  Or the Most Powerful Woman in the World Award awarded for no accomplishment. Spot a trend here?  Awards are handed out as easily as welfare in this entitlement age.  Nanny prizes in a Nanny state. Yah! 

But maybe the prize was in anticipation of job creation. Now, I expect the Volt will do for jobs as the Obama stimulus did for jobs.  Up in this north country, we need vehicles that will get us to work through drifts of snow and 40 below weather.  The volt, a tiny electric car will do that?  I think not.  So after not getting to work for a few days, your job will go where the millions of stimulus jobs went - one more job "created or saved" in the Obama world of fairy tales and tall tales.

Oh, and when you are stalled and freeze to death in the 40 below weather, why the Volt will get another prize -- for saving money under the Unhealth Care Law - you know, go directly home, bypass the death counseling, life lost but money saved.

OofDah!

Krugman's New Take on Death Panels

Paul Krugman has steadfastedly opposed Sarah Palin's "death panel" statements, calling her a liar and mocking her for suggesting the Obama Care bill sets up what are essentially death panel committees to determine if a patient is worth the treatment he or she needs.

But that was before the bill was passed.  Now that it has been passed, Krugman apparently has "learned what is in it," as Pelosi said we would.  Now that it has been passed, Krugman seems to think it is okay to reveal the truth even if the truth verifies Sarah's assessment.

Krugman, who denied the death panel provision with vigor several times before the passage of the bill, now says death panels and a VAT tax are the only way to deal with the runaway spending of this administration.  He made no mention of reducing the spending as a more intelligent and humane method of dealing with the issue.

What does that mean?  If you aren't healthy enough to earn tons of money to spend on VAT-tax inflated prices of necessities, you will be encouraged to die without your needed medical treatment?  Yep.  Obama Care doesn't want to provide health insurance for the elderly or infirm (unless perhaps you are also an illegal resident of this country).

Now they are not only eager to spend other people's money, but also want to spend other people's lives?

Toto, we aren't in America anymore - in America we respect life.

OofDah!  Goodby Gandma, goodbye Gramps, you aren't worth medical treatment.

Murkowski and Alaska

Murkowski seems mighty sure of Alaska.  She's counting on all the votes for "write in" to be for her, as if none of those votes could be for any of the other over one hundred write-in candidates.  She may be right, but it seems a flagrant disregard for all the other write ins.  At the least, she could have suggested that the write ins should be counted before a win be counted.  But that would require a little humility.

But those votes will have to be verified, and Alaska may be, just may be, lucky enough that the win will go to Joe Miller, after all. 

It would be good.  We've had about all the arrogance in DC that we can take.

Weird, Weird California

Minnesota has again proved that it is one of the most weird states in the Union.  But it has not yet reached the level of California.

I mean, really, Jerry Brown?  Hey, Californians, wasn't he an ineffective governor way back when?  Isn't this rather like watching a movie over and over hoping the ending will get better?

And judging by his victory speech, he's not getting better with age. He now also has either lost his marbles or has drug-fried his brain.  Either way, he's more than odd, he's freaky. Weird, weird, weird.

California is going down the drain financially, and Californians hire Jerry Brown to lead them in that direction?  They had another choice - Meg Whitman, a proven effective business woman.  It's just possible she could have led them up and out of the mess they are in. 

And they choose MerryJerry?

But California is weird, it's a gimme state that will be lining up at the federal pig trough for a bail out - because with the people they elected, it will be their only means of survival.  They seem to think it will be that easy.

But they may not find it that easy.  The new Congress may not be inclined to toss money at every problem as the old Congress has been doing.  The new people seem very hot to change that method of doing business.

OofDah!  Maybe California will have to make a real effort on their own to cut spending and balance their budget.  Some may have to give up the dole, go to work, and support themselves.

At least, they didn't legalize the dooby that apparently is anesthetizing their brains.

The Campaign is Over

I expect all of us will awake tomorrow and breathe a sigh of relief.  The incessant campaigning is over!

But think of this.  Those campaigns have been pumping millions into the US economy.  Tomorrow that, too, will be over.  Sobering thought, isn't it?

But never fear.  Our president is taking a trip projected to cost a couple hundred million per day.  Oh, yeah, that's right - he'll be spending that in India.

But cheer up.  The 2012 campaigns will begin soon - maybe tomorrow!

OofDah!

A Statement of Disgust

Election night and the citizens of this country have made a statement!  No doubt.  But will that statement be read correctly?  Will DC see that they must begin listening to the citizenry?  Will they practice a bit of humility and decide to change course?

Will the new people see this as what it obviously is - a rejection of DC corruption, arrogance, and elitism?  Or will they take it as a mandate and go on with business as usual?

This is an historic election.  Will we see an historic change of attitude in DC?  Will they now accept they work for us -- no matter how stupid they may think we are?

We the citizens of this country have spoken.

Meet Sanity at the Rally

This is just too funny! 

At the Rally to Restore Sanity, people were carrying signs declaring how smart they are.  That in itself is funny.  I'm surprised they didn't also carry signs declaring their unusual modesty. 

Enter a small group carrying a sign asking, "Obama a Keynesian?" and a man with a microphone.

The microphone man asks several people if they think Obama is a Keynesian.  The replies are downright hilarious. 

One lady makes such an, ah, fool of herself going ballistic and yelling, "He was born in Hawaii. He's given you proof. What more do you people want?"  Others are calmer but claim that most of us are from other places, like Italy, for instance.

If you want a good laugh, here is the link to the video:  http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/01/time-to-play/

Enjoy!!

Take his job! I demand it!

The Lisa Murkowski campaign is acting an awful lot like a group that supports the government arm reaching into lives of individuals.  She got a fellow fired from his radio job.  She claims to be a Republican, a conservative.  Hmmm.

The radio person had encouraged people to become write-in candidates to obfuscate Lisa's write-in campaign. She had to go with a write-in because she was rejected by the voters in the primaries and was late in deciding to run anyway.  A poor loser. 

I'm not sure of the legalities, but encouraging write-in candidates was certainly not as manipulative as outright lies against opponents.  And outright lies are disseminated every day by so-called news outlets. And no one takes away the jobs of the liars. 

So what have we here?  I know I wouldn't vote for Lisa simply because a poor loser who demands taking a job from an opponent is not my kind of candidate.  I don't want someone like that governing me, thank you.

Sarah Palin, An Influencial Woman

This morning I was thinking about what Sarah Palin means to this country and its politics in general and to women in particular.

Currently, Sarah does not hold an office but is a very influential woman, perhaps the most influential woman in US politics.  Like all active conservative women, she's been painted as a nutjob, ignorant, or just downright dangerous, but she perseveres and draws huge crowds who see the real woman, the intelligent woman who honestly believes our country can rise above dirty politics to be something better.

Her respect for women's abilities and for the power of their common sense has inspired so many women - some to aggressively seek office or aspire to a higher office than previously considered and some just to take a deeper interest in how they vote and what they vote for.  Women, young and old, are awakening to the importance of the female vote, the influence women can have on the direction this country takes - Mama Grizzlies and Gramma Grizzlies anxious to protect the young and the kind of country the young will inherit.

Why has she been so influential?  I think one reason is she has shown women that political involvement does not have to be limited to stodgy, corrupt old men worried only about their personal fortunes and shrill, unattractive women screaming about their right to kill babies. 

She has shown that attractive women with conscience and common sense can influence politics and attempt to clean up the corruption - try to raise the political machinations up from the mire.  This country deserves common sense in DC.  We should not have to be ashamed of the way Washington is run.

Sarah has validated conservative women in politics.  Like Sarah, they can get out of the kitchen and withstand the heat generated by their opinion that common sense, not corruption, should rule.

Vote on Tuesday

Are you voting on Tuesday? 

Have you truly considered your vote or are you supporting the same party you always have - even the same party your parents always did?  Or are you voting for the party your teachers and professors told you to support?  Or the party that you researched fifteen years ago and deemed good.

Your party has changed.  How do I know?  Because both parties have evolved over the years.  Your parents' party is no longer your parents' party.  Find out who is running it and what they stand for.

This is America.  Every voter is responsible for considering the pros and cons of each candidate.  Voting for a party is no longer acceptable.

My brother summed it up a while back.  He said, "I did not leave the party; they left me."

Be sure you know who and what you are voting for.  Make sure the policies the candidate supports are the policies you want to support. 

Our country is about to collapse under the weight of our debts and our policies.  Vote for the people you think will work for our survival.   All else is relatively unimportant. 

OofDah!  Make the right choices for our country.   My grandchildren are depending on you. 

Arizonians Quaking in Their Shoes?

Apparently the administration is sending Department of Justice (DOJ) personnel to "observe" at the polls in Arizona. 

Considering:

1. the behavior of this administration in regard to Arizona's state laws,
2. the administration's and the DOJ's attitude toward enforcing the federal laws applicable to the border, 
3. the administration's concession of a US zone along the border to the illegals and drug cartels
4. the DOJ's decision to let off the billy-club-wielding, threatening gangsters at the 2008 polls,

one has to wonder on which side of the law the DOJ people will be they get to Arizona.

As President Reagan said, some of the most frightening words in the English language are, "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."

OofDah!  That, I'm thinking, would be true in Spades in Arizona.  And they are accustomed to living next door to the drug thugs! 

Rally for Sanity Another Alice Moment

Another Alice moment.  The Rally to Restore Sanity.  A sign.  "I Support the Rally to Restore Sanity.  NAMBLA."

Hint MBL is for Man-Boy Love.  That's not my idea of sanity.  Not with boys in my family!

Another sign.  "I masturbate to Christine O'Donnell."  Held by some mother's daughter.  I'm sure she's proud of her sweet girl! 

I wonder, is the girl doing it to O'Donnell?  I mean is she offering it up as a gift?  Or does she mean "I masturbate, too, Christine."  I'm sure her English teacher is also proud of this literate girl.

Oh, yeah.  Sanity!   This rally was all about sanity!

Alice, are you down here in this rabbit hole?  Or are you inside the looking glass?

O'Donnell Guilty!

O'Donnell has been outed by a nasty kiss-and-tell story!  Yes, the New Jersey candidate has been indicted by an anonymous tattle-tale - a real sex scandal!

According to reports this damaging bit of smut relates details of a one-night stand --- but there is no intercourse involved!  How damning is that?!

And what kind of guy brags about a night for which he cannot claim a notch on his bedpost?!

Weirder and weirder - I feel like Alice in wonderland.

Terror and the Methodist Ladies Aid

Suddenly several suspicious packages seem to be floating around the world.  I don't want to trivialize the threat, but I heard on TV that authorities were profiling packages to help to identify any other threats.  Is that allowed?  Hasn't profiling, no matter how effective, no matter what the threat, been cast out of the law's toolbox?

Maybe they've thrown that limitation to the winds?  Maybe they'll no longer be watching members of the Methodist Ladies Aid in connection with terrorism originating in Yemen?

OofDah!  Maybe they acquired some sense??

The "View" from here is less than generous

I woke up this morning thinking about Joy Behar of The View.  Strange.  I never watch The View and my familiarity with it is confined to the coverage it gets on other programs. 

Sidenote: have you noticed how much the industry reports on itself lately?  We have become such a society of spectators that the programs people watch are increasingly part of the programs they watch!  Almost incestuous, wouldn't you say?

Back to the View and Joy Behar.  That woman seems very offensive.  Why would any woman speak of another woman in such terms?  She seems like a totally classless human being who should not be on national TV because of her ignorance and coarseness.  That kind of behavior belongs on the waterfronts of the 1940s.

Her victim, on the other hand, retaliated in a very classy way.  Flowers with a polite put down note.  How . . . well, how very classy! Not to mention effective.

You know, it has been reported that about 98% of blacks vote in a block for their own color.  I don't approve of voting on the basis of color or gender, but why don't women stick together a little more?  Just be a little more accepting of one another. Instead they are knifing one another in the back like thugs on (again) a 1940s waterfront.

I think it interesting that women who call themselves liberal, the meaning of which is open-minded, generous, and not prejudiced, exhibit the exact opposite traits. 

For one example, they believe in abortion for any reason, for any woman. Free choice, they say. I do not intend to debate the issue here but merely to point out that these self-defined open-minded, generous women, singularly are NOT open-minded and generous if any woman dares to choose differently from what they would.  Sarah Palin has been severely castigated for choosing to deliver a specially challenged baby, and Bristol Palin has received the same treatment for delivering a baby out of wedlock.  No, the "liberal" women absolutely do NOT believe in free choice.

And if those choosing differently from the generous liberals should happen to express their "Views" or be successful (even at dancing), the liberal knives are brandished threateningly.

Run the gamut of their beliefs and you will find the same lack of generosity and open-mindedness on most of the issues.  Not only unaccepting of other "Views," but downright mean and personally offensive. 

It seems in this election cycle that liberal women are extremely nasty toward conservative women.  It seems they cannot disagree without extreme personal attacks, branding their opponents with personally offensive remarks, names, and descriptions. 

What is the problem with them?  It's almost as though they are ashamed of or guilty for their own choices so NEED 100% compliance to justify them.  Just one woman deviating from their path is a challenge to their equanimity?

OofDah!   If they're that unsure of their choices perhaps they should revisit their convictions.  And perhaps choose a more generous "View."

Accusations "ist" going too far!

Motherhood used to be sancrosanct, now in the heat of the election, apparently it is sexist.

The TV was on, but I was busy and only peripherally heard the story.  I do not know the names of the people in the debate nor do I know where it took place, but apparently a woman cited her motherhood as part of her experience.  This was pounced upon as sexist! 

In the past, women were encouraged to cite their experience as mothers and homemakers when applying for a job.  After all, successfully handling a household and children requires great management skills, not to mention great patience.  Both of those attributes would be helpful in a political poisition, so I can see the sense in citing those skills in a political debate.

The detractors said men would not use fatherhood in a political debate.  Perhaps not, but few are actually deeply involved in the day-to-day management of their households and their children. 

I am so sick of EVERYTHING being labeled sexist, racist, or otherist.  I prefer hearing about motherhood as opposed to the "ist" labels. 

OofDah! Vote for anyone who refrained from "ist" accusations!

Who gets to vote

The craziness of politicians really comes to fore during an election year. 

In their boundless generousity, some pols extend a friendly welcome to all who will vote for their side, whatever the risks.  Their minions register anyone, felon or not, citizen or not, alive or not.  And the politicians stand behind those registrations - as long as they vote their way.

You see, there is no such thing as dishonesty or cheating in an election year.  Remember 2008?  Dishonesty or lying -- except in their own case -- then it was called it political expediency.

Unfortunately, in this great country founded on Christian principles, those principles of honesty have been shunned - even to the point of denying our heritage.  Shed the heritage, embrace lying and dishonesty, great idea!

So we have to guard against the practice of allowing absolutely everyone to vote, qualified or not, dead or alive.

Meanwhile, others are trying to give the vote to aliens, people who live here but have no interest in applying for citizenship and have no plan to give up their foreign citizenship, people whose allegiance is NOT to the United States.  Mexico and many of our illegal Mexican visitors openly advocate "taking back" our southern states; Arab terrorist supporters openly support the destruction of our country though they live here.  Many people who live here hate us and our country.

Should we let them vote to use our tax money to accomplish their aims? Let them vote to extend our welfare supports to millions in other countries?  Let them destroy this country?

Does no one see the danger in allowing these people a vote? 

OofDah!  Dead voters may be better than foreign voters.  Either may take us to hell.

Superman

Our very own super hero!  An American super hero!  Will he get his own comic book?

Who is it?  Well, it is the unassuming Harry Reid! 

He shyly told us himself, "I saved the world!"

Good thing he told us, else we'd never know.  Even after being fed the information, we're still having difficulty seeing it.

Anyone have any names for this latter day hero?  Superman is already taken.  Super Hare? Super Pol?

And what's his kryptonite? Truth?