Who Reads What?

"Sir" Paul's cheap and misleading comment about libraries was tacitly approved by Obama, a man we know reads daily -- from his teleprompter -- but eschews reading laws that he condemns with vigor.

The "superior" Obama poses as an intellectual giant but performs as an inept blowhard. He lays claim to exceptional intelligence but refuses to release his transcripts. Why? Would they put the lie to his claims?

I'm not Bush's greatest fan, but this "painting" of Bush as intellectually challenged by people who are truth challenged is unconscionable. In actuality, Bush was a reader:

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/articles/rove-72866-president-books.html

I also question whether the dissolute-looking "Sir" Paul has graced the halls of a library in recent years - at least with the intention of actually checking out a volume. And could he read it if he did?

OofDah!

Ya Gotta Wonder

Ya gotta wonder what office Sir Paul agreed not to run for to qualify for a job offer at the WH.

How much could we reduce the jobless rate if all the unemployed offered to NOT run for an office? Could the WH concoct enough sham jobs to accommodate them?